Call Grillo Barristers for a FREE consultation.
Remember, you will not pay any fee until your case is won or settled.
Request a FREE
Personal Injury Lawyers in Toronto for Car Accidents
Claim Against Your Own Insurance Company
The first claim is against your own insurance company for various benefits (accident benefits under the Statutory Automobile Insurance Act or the SABS) such as rehabilitation for both physical and psychological injuries that you sustained as a result of the accident, attendant care at home to assist you with your personal care, as well as income replacement benefits in the event you missed more than seven days of work.
Everyone injured in a motor vehicle accident is entitled to Accident Benefits, regardless of whether or not you are at fault for the accident.
It is important that you notify your insurance company of your injuries within seven days of the accident and advise them of your intention to apply for Accident Benefits. Delay in notification may result in a delay in your ability to obtain benefits.
Lawsuit Against the at-Fault Party
The second claim is a lawsuit against the party at fault for causing the accident. This is commonly referred to as a Tort Claim.
It is in this claim where one could be compensated for their pain and suffering (commonly referred to as general or non-pecuniary damages) as well as economic losses (beyond any income replacement benefits received under the SABS) and any other special damages, which would include among other things, out of pocket expenses for medications and housekeeping and home maintenance services that you are no longer able to perform as a result of your injuries.
The “Threshold Test” and Deductible
The current state of the law in Ontario requires you to have suffered a serious and permanent impairment of an important physical and/or psychological function in order to be compensated for general non-pecuniary damages for your pain and suffering. This is known as the statutory “Threshold Test”’.
The ‘Threshold Test’ considers how your life has significantly changed following a motor vehicle accident because of your serious and permanent accident related injuries.
You should also know that there is a $36,905.40 deductible that is applied to general non-pecuniary damage claims for pain and suffering. This deductible does not apply to awards for pain and suffering that are over $123,016.99. The Ontario government recently changed the law increasing the deductible by adding inflation to the deductible every passing year. This means the deductible will continue to rise every year.
Unfortunately, many people do not know about this and are kept in the dark by their insurers, policy-makers, lawmakers, the media and by the Courts. In fact, the Courts are not permitted to even disclose to a jury the existence of the deductible.
An optional endorsement can be purchased by anyone from their insurance company that reduces the deductible by a few thousand dollars However, again, this option is often not disclosed and properly explained by insurers and their brokers and sales agents and is virtually never purchased by anyone in Ontario.
You will also be entitled to compensation for any loss of income and loss of competitive advantage that is realized as a result of your accident related injuries. Claims for loss of income and/or a loss of earning capacity are not affected by the threshold test.
Defendants and their insurers will often attempt to argue that a plaintiff’s claim for loss of future income and loss of competitive advantage is too speculative. However, the law takes speculation into account and will grant plaintiffs an award if there is sufficient evidence on which to base the claim so long as the Court is satisfied on the basis of probabilities that the plaintiff will incur the losses. The losses can be compensated even if there is no reduction in the plaintiff’s income earnings, if the evidence supports a finding of injuries that restrict the plaintiff’s scope of employment or earnings that may become available in the future.
Where an injury causes a plaintiff to become less capable of earning income, become less marketable to potential employers and become less able to take advantage of employment opportunities that might otherwise have been available to them, they are entitled to damages for the losses.
Catastrophic Motor Vehicle Accidents
Any motor vehicle accident can in a split-second, result in serious brain, spinal order or extremity injuries that are catastrophic in nature. Determining whether injuries are deemed to be catastrophic is complicated and is often disputed by insurers. A combination of factors including physical, cognitive and psychological injuries are often considered determine the degree of impairment. Insurers will often hire their own independent doctors to assess your injuries with the foresight of finding grounds to deny that the injuries meet the legal criteria to qualify as a catastrophic impairment.
At Grillo Barristers, we understand that the importance of securing quality of care for people catastrophically injured in car accidents, while prosecuting their claims against their accident benefits insurer and the at fault motorist’s insurer, to the full extent of the law. We have a team of experienced medical professionals and healthcare providers who can provide access to specialized round-the-clock attendant care services. Our medical experts can also review your claim and prepare responding reports that fairly and accurately reflect on your injuries and impairments.
Investigating Accidents – Getting Access to Records
If you are involved in a motor vehicle accident, the burden of proof is on you to prove the other party was at fault for the accident. This is why it is imperative to have experienced counsel assist with conducting all necessary investigations to prove your claim.
The law permits plaintiffs to make general Freedom of Information (FOI) requests for records from specific bodies responsible for overseeing the disclosure of the information. For example, FOI requests can be submitted to municipalities to obtain access to records pertaining to road maintenance and police records. However, non-parties often do not disclose full records. For example, if a plaintiff is involved in a motor vehicle accident, it is not uncommon for police to redact a witness’ name, contact and even statements, photographs and investigation notes. A lawyer will often need to bring a motion before the Superior Court of Justice to demand access to the full records in order to be able to identify witnesses and provide valuable data to expert engineers, accident reconstructionists and medical specialists to better facilitate investigations of car accidents.
Time Limits to File Your Claim
In almost all cases, you only have two years from the date of the motor vehicle accident to commence a lawsuit against the at-fault party. Your failure to commence a lawsuit in the prescribed limitation period may result in your inability to forever make a claim. Moreover, your failure to have legal counsel and representation at the early stages may cause your claim to be neglected by your insurers and negatively impact the outcome of your claim.
Family Law Act Claimants
Family members of an injured claimant may also advance a claim pursuant to the Family Law Act. An action may be brought when the family member has actual expenses that are reasonably incurred for the benefit of the person injured; actual funeral expenses reasonably incurred in matters where the person is killed in the accident; reasonable allowances for travel expenses actually incurred in visiting the person during his or her recovery or treatment; when you provide housekeeping or other services for the injured person; and for the loss of guidance, care and companionship that you might have reasonably have expected to received from the injured or deceased person.
Family Law Act claimants are also subject to a deductible. This deductible does not apply in major accidents which lead to a fatality.
The law in Ontario can be complicated and the process can be overwhelming. It is important that you know your rights.
Request a FREE
Additional Articles – Car Accidents
Establishing who is at fault in a ChainReaction car accident
A “Chain Reaction” car accident is an accident where three or more vehicles are involved in a series of rear-end collisions that are caused primarily by the force of the first collision. In order to establish who is at fault, you will need to prove liability under the law of “negligence.” A driver will be negligent if they were driving carelessly. Also, if one or more drivers were negligent, each vehicles’ share of liability must be determined as well.
The example below illustrates how this works:
In the above example, Driver C and Driver B are stopped at an intersection. Driver A rear-ends Driver B and because of the force, this causes Driver B to rear-end Driver C. In this scenario, it is likely Driver A will bear the majority of the responsibility for the accident, if not all of it.
However, it is not always this simple. If other drivers can be proven to be at fault as well, this can subtract some of the fault from Driver A. For example, if Driver C failed to use their brake lights or other signals, a portion of the responsibility for the accident may be given to Driver C.
It is often difficult to determine who causes the crash and the subsequent crashes that followed, until the parties and their respective lawyers attend court and undergo cross-examinations. Insurance companies understand these complications and use them to their advantage. At Grillo Barristers, we will help you pursue your claim for serious injuries caused by a chain-reaction car accident. Call us today at +1(416)-614-6000 for a free consultation.
Will cannabis legalization lead to more car accidents?
Health Canada had conducted the Canadian Cannabis Survey (“CCS”), which intended to help lawmakers anticipate the effects of cannabis legalization on driving. The CCS sought to investigate the attitudes of Canadian cannabis consumers and predict the effects of legalization on road safety. The CCS revealed that 39% of individuals who had used cannabis in the twelve months prior to the survey have driven within two hours of use. Furthermore, the CCS illustrated that males were more likely to drive within two hours of cannabis use than females. 46% of the individuals who admitted to operating a vehicle within two hours of cannabis use also reported that they had done so 1 in 10 times in the past year, while 29% of them indicated doing so more than 10 times in the past year.
The results of the CCS survey can seem alarming in its regard to road safety. This is especially so because it is widely recognized that cannabis severely impairs the judgment, reaction time, coordination, and motor skills of drivers. Three quarters of the individuals surveyed by the CCS reported that they believe cannabis use affects their driving abilities. The survey helped establish that many cannabis users know that the substance impairs their driving abilities, but some continue to drive anyway. The findings of the CCS have led many people to query whether Canadians will endure an increase in motor vehicle accidents as a consequence of cannabis legalization and cannabis consumers’ attitudes towards drug-impaired driving. Perhaps attitudes towards impaired driving as it relates to cannabis use will change as a result of further awareness campaigns and the recent criminal law reform which have implemented severe penalties for drug-impaired driving.
It is still too early to prognosticate whether legalization of cannabis will increase the frequency of motor vehicle accidents in Canada. However, it is probably not too farfetched to anticipate a positive correlation between marijuana legalization and motor vehicle accidents. Hopefully, our government will strictly enforce the new drug-impaired driving laws and continue to fund awareness campaigns, which encourage drivers to remain cognizant of the risks of drug-impaired driving.
If you have been injured in a motor vehicle accident as a result of impaired driving, make sure to receive a free consultation from one of our experienced Toronto accident and injury lawyers. We will advocate for your rights and get you the compensation you deserve.
What you need to know about Canada legalizing Marijuana
- Minimum Age: 19+
- Sales locations: Initially, only through the Ontario Cannabis Store and then through regulated
brick-and-mortar stores in April 2019.
- Smoking locations: In private residences and in other public places determined by municipal bylaws.
- Possession limit: 30 grams while in public and no limits while at home.
Marijuana Use and Driving
Impaired by drugs has always been illegal and following the legalization of marijuana, it is going to remain illegal. Police can demand that a driver comply with either a standardized field sobriety test or provide an oral fluid sample if they reasonably suspect a drug is in the driver’s body. If they have reasonable grounds to believe an offence has been committed, they can demand a blood sample or a drug recognition evaluation.
Although use of marijuana is now legal, an insurance company could deny benefits to a driver who was convicted of a driving offence under the influence of marijuana.
The legalization of marijuana has created some unique legal challenges. If you have been involved in a car accident, whether or not you were under the influence of marijuana, you should hire a lawyer before talking to an insurance representative. Call Grillo Barristers today at +1(416)-614-6000 for a free consultation.